A research concept from GrytLabs · Decision Lineage Protocol

Review, funded.
Identity, blinded.
Reputation, signed.

A funded market for independent verification. Bounties in fiat. Identities sealed until claimed. Every finding cites ground truth. Every reviewer carries a signed, portable reputation stamp.

fiat bounties · no token blind by construction signed, portable reputation
How the commons works
Peer review is unfunded, opaque, and impossible to audit. The Commons prices it, blinds it, and signs it.
Ground truth, chunked & cited
Every object is decomposed into provenance-tagged chunks — findings, syntheses, citations. A finding cites the chunk it disputes, not a general impression.
Blind by construction
Author and funder stay sealed from the reviewer until a bounty is claimed, and reviewer identity stays sealed from both, always. Independence is a gate, not a policy.
Priced in fiat, never a token
Bounties are funded in dollars, paid on accepted findings. No token sits between the work and the pay — and no one can fund review of their own work.
Signed, portable reputation
Every submitted review mints a stamp, ORCID and GPG signed. It travels with the reviewer, federated across the commons — not held by any one platform.
Preview · board, workspace and profile below
The Review Commons
a GrytLabs research concept
Seat
{{ idInitials }}
{{ idName }}
ORCID {{ idOrcid }}
{{ boardKicker }}

{{ boardTitleA }}{{ boardTitleB }}

{{ boardSub }}

{{ st.v }}
{{ st.l }}
Field
Disclosure
Sort
independence enforced no token · plain fiat
{{ b.kind }} {{ b.disc }} {{ b.ref }} {{ b.field }}
{{ b.title }}
{{ b.chunks }} chunks ~{{ b.words }} words effort {{ b.effort }} {{ b.rubric }}
{{ b.claimed }}/{{ b.needed }} claimed
{{ b._identHead }}
{{ il.k }} {{ il.v }}
{{ b._bountyStr }}
{{ b._bountyNote }}
{{ ws.disc }} {{ ws.ref }} {{ ws.kind }}

{{ ws.title }}

{{ ip.k }}
{{ ip.v }}
Ground truth · the chunk graph click a chunk to cite it
Standardized rubric · {{ ws.rubric }} locked · not author-editable
{{ rb.name }}
{{ rb.q }}
Log a finding · must cite ground truth
ground-truth citation {{ citeText }}
Findings {{ findingsCount }}
{{ f._sevLabel }} {{ f._dimName }} ↳ {{ f.citation }}
{{ f._noteText }}
No findings yet. Select a chunk on the left, grade a dimension, and log what the evidence actually supports.
{{ submitNote }}
No review open.

Claim a bounty from the Board to open its object, its ground-truth chunks, and the standardized rubric here.
{{ idInitials }}

{{ idName }}

ORCID {{ idOrcid }} GPG {{ idGpg }} {{ idTier }}
{{ earnedStr }}
earned · fiat · lifetime
Signed reputation stamp portable · federated across the commons
{{ ax.label }} {{ ax.note }} {{ ax.disp }}
Findings logged · by severity · {{ findTotal }} total
{{ d.label }}
{{ d.count }}
Activity
{{ ac.v }}
{{ ac.l }}
Calibrated on
{{ sk.label }}
—— SIGNED · VERIFIABLE ——
orcid  {{ idOrcid }}
gpg    {{ idGpg }}
sha256 {{ stampHash }}
status ✓ signed · {{ repReviews }} reviews
Forward · open seam

How a stamp accrues, decays, and gets slashed is the unresolved reputation mechanic. This profile shows the axes; the lifecycle rules are still to be specified.
Prototype · sample data
No live bounties
yet.

Everything on this page is sample data: the objects, people, funders, IDs, bounties and stamps. The Review Commons began as a GrytLabs research concept; this prototype is where it gets tested in the open.

Concept map → · About this project · camsmith.xyz

{{ toast }}
Claiming a blind review · {{ claimRef }}
On accept, the independence gate opens.
{{ ct.h }}
{{ ct.d }}
Post a review bounty · funder
Fund independent review.
{{ postConflictText }}